Saturday, June 30, 2012

How Muslim Brotherhood went from 7 members to Egypt's presidency -By NANCY A. YOUSSEF

CAIRO -- When Hassan al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928, the membership was just seven people - al-Banna and six other workers in the port city of Suez, his only surviving sibling, 91-year-old brother Gamal, recalled recently. The British were in charge of Egypt then, and Hassan al-Banna feared that their rule would end Islam.

Al-Banna, a teacher and imam who preached in mosques and coffee shops alike, hoped that members of the Brotherhood would gradually introduce Islamic thought into the mainstream, so that one day Egypt's president and the society he led would be imbued with a shared way of thinking. He never contemplated, however, that the Brotherhood would become a political group or its members would seek political office, Gamal said.

Yet on Saturday, a member of al-Banna's Brotherhood will become Egypt's president. It's the most concrete example of how al-Banna's long-ago goal to save Islam from Western influences in his homeland came to define politics throughout the Arab world, engendering fear in the West and earning the Brotherhood the enmity of many Arab leaders.

The rise of Mohammed Morsi to the presidency is the story of the evolution of the Brotherhood, experts say, a tale of how a secret society with a history of violence - al-Banna was assassinated in 1949 - came to accept modern political compromise. One scholar of the Brotherhood called the group the Arab world's tea party: "dogmatic but politically practical."

The Brotherhood wants to apply Islamic law in a way that's different from what the United States understands it to be, said former member Kamal al-Helbawy. "It is freedom of expression, justice, shura (an Islamic advisory council) and human rights," said al-Helbawy, who left the Brotherhood last year after a 60-year membership because he disagreed with what he characterized as the furtive way the group now was governed.

"The Muslim Brotherhood wants to revive the Islamic civilization. ... We are trying to bring people back to the right approach of Islam that is based on the Islamic civilization," said Amr Darrag, a Brotherhood member of the 100-person assembly that's charged with writing Egypt's new constitution. "I know (Morsi) on a personal level. He has a strong character and he doesn't easily surrender. ... He is a very good choice for this period."


Al-Banna's group was one of many that popped up during the 1920s, when Egypt was liberal, occupied and itching for independence. But, as his elderly brother explained, in his office surrounded by books, al-Banna was the most organized of them all, a quality that defines the Brotherhood and allowed it to become Egypt's largest political organization within 20 years.

Hassan al-Banna welcomed anyone who wanted to join. Then he took his members, who represented every segment of society, and urged them to spread the message through their various unions, in media and in their communities.


Al-Banna believed that Egypt had lost its Islamic way and could fix its political situation only by changing the thinking of every Egyptian. That required members to integrate themselves into society and urge Egyptians to reconsider every aspect of their lives: education, Arab nationalism, development.

As Gamal recalled, his older brother despised politics. In a push for a simple life, his brother didn't own a car or have a bank account, Gamal said. But his organizational skills created a group that attracted power. And it empowered itself by providing social services to the less fortunate, earning their loyalty. From its earliest days until now, it sticks to message, a characteristic evident in Cairo's Tahrir Square, where supporters from throughout Egypt repeat the latest message from the Brotherhood verbatim.

"My brother once said, 'We don't want power, but power is seeking us,' " Gamal said. "He did not like politics, truly. But at the end of Hassan al-Banna's life it became the biggest organization in Egypt, so it had to be involved in politics."


Although many members weren't educated, the Brotherhood became a home for some Islamic scholars, who gave religious justification to the group's thinking.

"You need someone to issue the fatwas," said Ashraf el-Sherif, a Brotherhood expert at the American University in Cairo, describing what became known as the al-Azhar thread of the group, referring to the university in Cairo that's Sunni Islam's premier site of Islamic thought.


Violence wasn't a part of the group's early years, but the Brotherhood sent members to fight on behalf of the Palestinians in the war that led to the creation of Israel in 1949. That gave the Brotherhood a cadre of experienced fighters, and gave Egypt's leaders the fear that it could be plotting a coup.

Prime Minister Mahmoud Fahmi an-Nukrashi Pasha was the first of many Egyptian leaders to disband the group, and in 1948 a young Brotherhood member dressed as a police officer entered the Ministry of the Interior and assassinated him. A year later, al-Banna was shot to death while waiting for a cab after the government officials he was scheduled to meet with failed to show up. The site is now home to two spinoff Brotherhood organizations.

The 1952 revolution that ended the British presence in Egypt was a turning point in Brotherhood thought. Believing that the leader of that revolt, then-Col. Gamal Abdel Nasser, would embrace the Brotherhood's religion-based ideas, the Brotherhood worked with him to oust King Farouk and British imperialism.

But Nasser turned out to be more secular than the Brotherhood had expected. Once he became president, he began to monopolize power and arrest Brotherhood members. "The mistake of the Brotherhood was that they underestimated Nasser," American University's el-Sherif said. "They thought they were stronger."

In October 1954, a Brotherhood member attempted to assassinate Nasser, but the shots missed. Nasser retaliated with a massive crackdown that saw thousands of Brotherhood members arrested.

Among those who found themselves in jail was Sayed Qutb, whose writings in prison would reshape the Brotherhood.

Where al-Banna believed in slowly integrating into the existing order, Qutb believed in quickly creating a counter-society. It was secular, evil ideas introduced by British imperialism that threatened the Egyptian state, Qutb argued. The way to counter them was to create conservative communities, isolated from Western taint, he argued. His thinking took hold in part of the Brotherhood and would later become crucial to the philosophy of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida.


Another strain of thought also was taking hold within the Brotherhood, and it was there that the group began to show its skill for political adaptability. It compromised, negotiated and worked with the existing secular state system.

"They wanted to stay out of jail," said Mohammed Abbas, a 30-something Brotherhood member until last year, when he started his own youth party.


By the 1970s, Qutbists shared power within the Brotherhood with a strain of so-called Salafists, conservative Islamists who were financed by donations from Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf nations where the oil boom was generating enormous wealth. Those donations paid for schools and media campaigns that introduced more conservative thinking on issues such as women and relations with Christians.

The Brotherhood renounced violence, but its seemingly conflicting message led to several violent offshoot groups such as al-Gamaa al-Islamaya, which the United States considered a terrorist organization. Members of yet another splinter group were responsible for the 1981 assassination of President Anwar Sadat after Sadat had signed a peace agreement with Israel.

It was during this period of ferment, in 1977, that Morsi joined the Brotherhood, while he was studying engineering in Los Angeles.

The period in which he joined continues to shape his thoughts today, according to el-Sherif. Morsi is both a religious conservative and a believer in moving quickly on reform.

"Morsi is a Salafist in how he understands faith but a Qutbist in how he understands organization," el-Sherif said.


By the 1990s, a new type of Brotherhood member had emerged, one who was more liberal than the organization itself. Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, a onetime leading presidential contender, is a leader among this group. Such members embraced democracy and women's rights and revived the kind of gradual integration that al-Banna called for.

Which strain of the Brotherhood Morsi will represent isn't yet clear. He's shown himself to be a willing negotiator. In his first speech after his election was confirmed, he peppered Islamic references with a call for national unity. He issued a 16-point plan to be implemented in 100 days that began with instilling Islamic values and creating 700,000 jobs. Perhaps realizing the limitations of power, he later adjusted his timeline to "as soon as possible."


How he deals with Western influences is still to be seen. Many expect friction.

"The United States must now decide whether it will embrace a democratically elected Islamist or a secular dictator," al-Helbawy said.

However it turns out, Gamal al-Banna, 14 years younger than his brother and never a part of his brother's organization, is convinced of one thing: Morsi's election would please his brother.

Very simply, he said, his brother would embrace it because "it was God's will."

Courtesy: The Kansas City Star

Originally Posted on Fri, Jun. 29, 2012 04:28 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/2012/06/29/3683723/how-muslim-brotherhood-went-from.html

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Khelafat Good Governance as Perceived by the Mystic Bauls of Bangladesh

Selected Excerpts from Prof. Md.Amzad Hossain's "I am Harun Baul Speaking part-21"

[ http://baulism.blogspot.com/2012/04/im-harun-baul-speaking-part-21.html ]


তোমরা সব খলিফা র'লে, যে যা বুঝে দিও বলে।

অসৎ অভক্ত জনা, গুপ্ত ভেদ তারে বলো না

বলিলেও সে মানিবে না, করবে অহঙ্কারী।

নেকতন বান্দারা যত, বেদ পড়ে আউলিয়া হতো

নাদানেরা শুল চাছিতো, মনছুর তার সাবেদ আছে। (লালন ফকির)
-(Lalon Fakir)


(The Prophet (sm) instructed the Khalifas to advise the general people in accordance with their levels of understanding. The dishonest and non-devotees should not be told about the higher truth, for they are likely to reject it. All the righteous people can become Auliya (Godly) by understanding the higher truth while the fools are engaged in sharpening their spears. The case of Mansur (Hallaj) bears witness to it (whom they killed).


Guru Aziz Shah Fakir (104) relates the above notion of the Prophet Muhammad to his Khalifas in political terms of the Khelafat governance.

It clearly suggests that under the Khelafat system of good governance, the citizens should be dealt with in accordance with their level of understanding.

This wisdom is also equally applicable in the cases of dealing with economic and other needs of the people of a given time and place. Linking the concept to the case of present governance Bangladesh, the guru recognises a lack of good governance (Sushason) that persists at the heart of the present untenable situation in Bangladesh. He emphasises good governance as the jugular vein of a nation; and the practice of Khelafat’s good governance duly powered by the Islamic deliberative democracy can revitalize the sharply depleting happiness, traditional self-reliance, religiosity, patriotism, family and social bondage and eco-spirituality. The Khelafat system of governance is therefore a sustainable alternative that can transform Bangladesh to be (re)branded as the happiest nation on earth.


Bangladesh being predominantly a fertile land of population growth, agriculture and fisheries, it is a superior country for long-term sustainability. But unfortunately, the country has hardly experienced good governance that could potentially allow for political stability, and foster the human-nature interconnectedness through sustainable development. The guru stresses that the rising degradation of natural resources, water crisis, the widening gaps between the rich and poor, corruption, crimes and gender conflicts, are largely due to persisting mal-governance. The guru also stresses that politicians’ commitment to good governance has not been possible because it is integrally connected to people’s values system; and the current political as well as cultural values system of Bangladesh is at its worst. This values system is severely inflicted with selfishness and self-centricity that is intensely opposed to share things with fellow beings and care for natural resources. This disconnection of sharing and caring leads people to disengage themselves from their spiritual core of self-reliance and happiness.


Against this backdrop, the guru explores ways to restore just governance within the framework of the Khelafat system as was implemented by the Prophet Muhammad and the first four Khalifas of Islam (Abu Bakr, Omar, Osman and Ali). The guru asserts that the Khelafat system can create competent, honest, responsible and patriotic civil servants, activists and other actors. In this context, the guru adds that a Khalifa as a human representative or Vicegerent of God on earth can be a person of any colour, culture or religion, who, in congruence with the Quranic revelation, can coulour oneself with the colour of God. This means that a Khalifa has to acquire collective knowledge, lessons and wisdom for governance purposes and also for transmitting them to other people in order to maintain individual, familial, social, economic, religio-cultural, political and ecological sustainability. Then, how to acquire diverse knowledge for achieving Khalifaship (stewardship) integrity in order to keep natural system healthy for human sustainability? Most religions talk about acquiring diverse knowledge. The knowledge of nurturing nature and the realization of human’s absolute dependence on eco-resources intrinsically help acquire the wisdom for understanding the inner meaning humanity (i.e. know thyself). The notion of human as the Ashraful Mukhlukat (the best of creation) is embedded in this concept. ....

পাড়ে কে যাবি নবীর নৌকাতে আয়
রপ কাস্থের নৌকা খানি নাই ডুবার ভয়।
বেচারা নাইয়ে যারে
তুফানে যাবে মারা
এক ধাক্কায়।

(Ride on to the boat (Tarika) of the Prophet, if one who wishes to go across (the river of life). The boat is made of such a timber (virtues)) that has no fear of drowning. But those who are undisciplined boatman, they will ruin by a single blow).


The guru observes that Islamic original political culture as devised by the Prophet has hopelessly failed to demonstrate its ingeniousness over the global political culture, only due to the lack of maintaining the chain (Silsila) of succession after the fourth Khalifa Hazrat Ali. In fact, this deviation has eventually resulted in the downturn of Islamic governance worldwide; and currently, it has probably reached to its worst. However, the Sufi Islam that is still prominent in Bangladesh has the Tariqat (way) for safeguarding the politicians (Khalifas) who chose to embark on the Prophet’s and the four Khalifas’ Shariah of good governance. ....


The undisciplined politicians, religious bigots, ignorant pundits and egoistic civil servants who now own in the country’s governance are the Beshora Neye ( বে-শরা নাইয়া ) according Harun Baul’s sustainability assessment criteria. Consequently, the political culture in the land of Sufis which has been devoid of the spirit(uality) of Sufism, is justifiably failing to demonstrate the Banglalee cultural ingeniousness over the Western socio-political culture.


However, a new Nauka (boat) is to be built under the guidance of the Tarikat of the Sharia of Khelafat’s good governance system in order to carry out the following sustainability precepts and practices:


1. Practice of Religious and Cultural Values (ধর্ম ও সংস্কৃতির আমল)


Culture reflects the colour of a religion. Secularism of Sufi spirituality is prominent in Bangladesh and therefore communal conflict is almost non-existent. Khalafat governance will enrich the culture by wiping out the impurities generated by the Western democracy. Guru Aziz Shah Fakir has the code of life(style), religion and culture – the main aspects of human life. The following examples manifests guidelines for the aspects.


a. Satya bal su pathe chal, o re amar mon (সত্য বলো সুপথে চলো, ও রে আমার মন)


(O my mind, always tell the truth and remain on the 'Straight Path').


Guru Aziz Shah Fakir says that this is the seed ‘spell’ (mantra) for all religions.


b. The second mantra is:


মানুষ গুরু নিষিদ্ধ যার
সর্ব সাধন সিদ্ধ হয় তার।


Manush guru nishtha jar
Shorbo shadhon siddha hoy tar.


(All aspirations are fulfilled if endeavours for learning are guru-centric)


c. Thirdly:


আগে কি সুন্দর দিন কাটাইতাম
গ্রামের নওজোয়ান, হিন্দু মুসলমান
মিলিয়া বাউলের গান আর মুর্শিদী গাইতাম (বাউল আব্দুল করিম শাহ)
Baul Abdul Karim shah

(What a delightful time we had in the past. The village youths from the Hindu and Muslim communities used to sing Baul and Mushidi songs together).


There are hundreds of examples in this context that are practical in nature. Whatever we learn needs to be practiced. The Sufi culture requires the Khalifa to ‘learn from the people who know’ and follow the path and doings of the blessed people who are known as the Aulyia or friends of God. Teachings of a wise master or a Khalifa – formally or otherwise – is primarily to teach people how to practice charity, modesty, live simply, honesty, truthfulness, tolerance, respectfulness, trustworthiness, responsibility, discipline, sociality, care taking and nature nurturing. These values can cause to vanish growing corruption, cheating, bestiality and lawlessness as water can extinguish water. The legal framework of the Khelafat governance is to implement the moral principles so that people’s mindset becomes values-driven. The corrective measures are to be provided in order to treat the odds.


2. Fish and tree for everyone (সবার জন্য মাছ ও গাছ)


Everyone needs fish and fruit trees. This is achievable should the Ward Khalifas know how to initiate and implement fishing and plantation programs in their respective area. To avail fish and fruits for everyone, watersheds need to be maintained so that they are deep enough to hold knee-level water in the summer as a poem reads:


আমাদের ছোট নদী চলে বাঁকে বাঁকে,
বৈশাখ মাসে তার হাটু জল থাকে।


(ameder soto nodi chole babnke banke;
boishakh mashe tar hatu jol thake)


Fishing, especially the immature, fingerlings and mother fish with eggs must be stopped seasonally, and fish export can be allowed only after meeting the local people’s needs. Plantation for regeneration and restoration of fruit trees in abundance must be done throughout the banks of watersheds and roadside including some timber trees, cane, bamboos and medicinal plants and herbs on the roadsides. If this is implemented, it will not only help avail fruits and meet household needs for those who have no place to grow, but also meet the needs of the present and future healing of illness, it will also ensure environmental sustainability. Perceiving this, Baul Bijoy Sarkar reveals:


ঐ পৃথিবী যেমন ছিলো, তেমনি ঠিক রবে
সুন্দর ঐ পৃথিবী ছেড়ে চলে যেতে হবে।


Ai prithibi jemon silo, Temoni thik robe
Sundar ai prithibi sere chole jete hobe.


(We are obliged to leave this beautiful earth, keeping the earth in its natural form). The song implies that one generation should leave this beautiful earth aesthetically and eco-systematically unchanged for meeting the needs of the generations to come; and next generation will be obliged to follow their ancestor’s tradition. This notion is also the core of the concept of sustainable development.


3. Full support for the people willing to work overseas (কাজের জন্য বিদেশ যাত্রীদেরকে টাকা ধার)


Almost every family with workable manpower wants to send a family member overseas. The Ward Khalifas can implement this national project giving financial support from the Khalifa’s local development fund to those who are in need. Producing exportable workforce with values, quality and skill is the holy responsibility of the Khalifas. This responsibility will inspire the Ward Khalifas and the candidates (present and future) to introduce adequate logistical support for the same).


4. Facilities for small-scale industrial productivity (ক্ষুদ্র ও কুটির শিল্পের অবাধ বিস্তার)


This will help families needing extra income. The Khelafat system of governance can launch a revolutionary industrial transformation process towards achieving economic self-reliance as Gandhi propagated. The households can spin, weave and make their own dresses and sell to others. Cotton, jute, silk, wool and other local fibers can be used. This provision can employ a huge amount of workforce including women, children, and the aged. The Khelafat governance can introduce a policy that the country’s local needs for garments are to be wholly produced locally.


5. To narrow down the lifestyle gaps between rich and poor (ধনি দরিদ্রের জীবন যাত্রা মানের বৈষম্য কমান)


This can be achieved through a national policy which can motivate the rich or elite class to come closer to the poor in their dress and food habit; addressing poor with respect; and sharing each other’s joy and sorrow. A national policy with wide manifestation of better-off people’s brotherhood/sisterhood mannerism to the ordinary folks (sub-ordinates, employees, servants, labourers); a habit of sharing food, dress, affordable money, and joy and sorrow with the have-nots; the well-offs' visit to poor neighbourhood and hospitals; modest and simple lifestyle in terms of dress - all these will automatically bring down poverty situation both materially and psychologically. Harun Baul asserts that alleviation of poverty is neither possible in the geo-environmental and cultural conditions of Bangladesh, nor it is at all desirable for the sake of a long-term sustainability of the renewable resources of the county. Thus, a poverty-like modest lifestyle is the sustainable direction for Bangladesh. And this applies also for the global sustainability.


6. Self-reliance centric foreign policy (স্বনির্ভরকেন্দ্রিক বৈদেশিক নীতি)


Diplomatic relationship with foreign countries needs to be central to earning foreign currency to assist our self-reliant sustainability in terms of cotton, oil, chemicals, minerals, etc that our country currently lacks. We have exportable manpower and garments as the means to earning foreign currency. In the wake of declining population growth in the so-called developed countries where the primary schools suffer from the scarcity of the starters and industries are closed down because of the shortage of labour force, it is clear that the present rate of population growth is sustainable if they are properly educated and trained for employment or migration overseas.


Finally, the guru is also concerned about the number of ministries. For a country like Bangladesh where the prevalence of immorality such as corruption, cheating, exploitation, extortion, lawlessness and bestiality is rampant, it is essential that the existing numerous ministries be integrated into a few Apex Ministries; and they are to be controlled by lowly paid or Honorary Executive Khalifas.


In conclusion, Harun Baul suggests that it is crucial for the pro-Khelafat parties ...to start their work at the grassroots level to find competent Khalifas at the Ward, Union and Thana level. They should also seek support from the Non-Resident Bangladeshi (NRB) for outlining working papers for triggering the Khelafat system of deliberative democratic governance.


(To be continued)

Dated 24-04-2012 www.bangladesh-web.com

Md. Amzad Hossain
a.hossain@curtin.edu.au